Catch the clause that costs you $10K
Upload your contract. In 60 seconds, see every risky clause explained in plain English — the stuff a $300/hr lawyer would flag, without the invoice.
Your data is protected
What Tutelr Catches
The IP clause broader than the project. The liability cap that doesn't actually cap anything. The non-compete buried in paragraph 31. Our AI catches them all.
Risky Clause Detection
Payment traps, IP grabs, unlimited liability, hidden non-competes — our AI flags them all and explains each risk in plain English.
High RiskMissing Protections
Spot what's NOT in the contract. AI identifies standard clauses that should be there — liability caps, IP ownership, termination rights — and explains why they matter.
Medium RiskAI Counter-Contract
One click generates a rewritten contract that fixes risky clauses and adds missing protections. Your counter-proposal, ready in seconds.
Pro FeatureSee What Tutelr Finds
Here's what a real analysis looks like — from an anonymized freelance web development contract.
Freelance Web Development Agreement
PDF · 2,847 words · Analyzed in 28s
This contract contains 7 issues across payment terms, intellectual property, and liability. The IP assignment clause is overly broad and the liability section lacks any cap — both are critical negotiation points before signing.
"All work product, including but not limited to designs, code, concepts, and derivative works created during or related to the engagement shall become the sole and exclusive property of the Client."
Why This Is Risky
"Related to the engagement" is dangerously broad — it could include your personal projects, open-source contributions, or tools you built before this contract. The clause also assigns "concepts" and "derivative works" with no limitation.
Suggested Fix
Narrow to "work product created specifically for and directly under this Statement of Work" and exclude pre-existing IP, tools, and frameworks.
"Payment shall be made within sixty (60) days of Client's acceptance of the final deliverable. Client may withhold payment if deliverables do not meet specifications."
Why This Is Risky
Net-60 after "acceptance" with no defined acceptance timeline means payment could be delayed indefinitely. The withholding clause has no objective criteria — "specifications" is undefined.
Suggested Fix
Change to Net-30 from invoice date. Add a 10-business-day deemed-acceptance clause and define acceptance criteria in the SOW.
No Liability Cap
This contract contains no limitation of liability clause. Without one, you could be liable for unlimited damages — including indirect, consequential, and lost-profit claims far exceeding the contract value.
Suggested Clause
Add: "Total liability under this agreement shall not exceed the fees paid in the 12 months preceding the claim. Neither party shall be liable for indirect, incidental, or consequential damages."
+ 4 more findings including scope creep risk and missing termination clause
Try It On Your Contract — FreeNo credit card required · First 5 analyses free
Don't Sign Another Contract Blind
A lawyer charges $300/hr for contract review. Enterprise tools start at $99/month. Tutelr gives you the same risky-clause detection, in 60 seconds, for $19/month. Your first 5 analyses are free.